bigsugar316 wrote:
It's all about pricing. The music industry needs to learn from the movie industry. Think about how DVD's come out. When they're New Releases they're like $20 or whatever. After a few months they get marked down and start showing up in the "2 for" sections. Then after further price reductions, they usually get down in the $10 range. Do CD's? No. The stupid record companies keep the stuff so expensive, if not increasing the price! Why do old Rolling Stones albums still cost $20?
I know when I was in the UK in December all the Prodigy albums had been reduced and were really cheap, but here in Canada in HMV they're selling them for like $30!!! Then the record industry moans that people download. Fuck yeah, why should you pay these prices for old albums?
The pricing structure for DVDs is perfect. Mark it up as a New Release when it first comes out and make your margins, then reduce it and continue to get turns off it for years to come. *Once* the studios do that, then they can complain. And just for the record, I but tons of albums. I dropped well over ВЈ1,000 on CD's last time i was in the UK. I've bought like 200 CDs in the last year probably.
I agree. Plus isn't it great to be able to make your own cds with all that music you downloaded? *visions of hell"
Josso wrote:
I'd much rather have CD's to Mp3, infact with singles I always buy vinyls instead of CD's... I think instead of killing CD business mp3 has benefitted it. I mean all the stuff I had on mp3 I now how either on CD or Vinyl.
Slightly incoherent are we? getting old?
The arrival of mp3 seems to have been ulterior to your purchasing cds and vynils. You seem to have first gotten your tunes on mp3. Thats what the industry is moaning about.