Home COMMUNITY FORUM
Welcome, Guest
Username Password: Remember me

Made in Two Minutes
(1 viewing) (1) Guest
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: Made in Two Minutes

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56617

Majin wrote:
Are those special decks made for really big CDs?


They are for circuitous MP3s.

Numark TTX1
  • WayneB
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 2902
A lovely thank you to Mr. W 30, James Jupiter the 8th, Mrs. 303, Mr. 909, and especially Monsieur Akai 1100 (The Earthbound Crew)

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56626

WayneB wrote:

They are for circuitous MP3s.

Numark TTX1

Oh, are those like Laser Disc but for music?
  • Majin
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 397

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56628

Majin wrote:
WayneB wrote:

They are for circuitous MP3s.

Numark TTX1

Oh, are those like Laser Disc but for music?

What? No, don't be stupid.
Think more like Blu-Ray, but at HQ 320KBPS (Lossless)
  • Martinstatic
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 1579

XLBaron wrote:
Shoot heroin in ur ass!

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56630

I listened to this track a few seconds ago and it's very good Prodigy tune.
  • psho7
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 1151

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56666

Martinstatic wrote:

What? No, don't be stupid.
Think more like Blu-Ray, but at HQ 320KBPS (Lossless)

16-bit Lossless is 1411 kbps, 24-bit lossless is even higher. MP3 320kbps is lossy as shit. Don't be stupid
  • Majin
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 397

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56668

Elitists

With a proper mpeg rip at 320/kbs bit rate and 48K Hz sample rate, it´s not far from physicly impossible for a human to hear any difference from a, say FLAC.

Listening to lossless copies: pointless. Ripping from a lossless copy, obviously better than ripping from CD audio...

Back to topic: /thread soon?
  • FrankTheTank
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 288

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56670

FrankTheTank wrote:
Elitists

With a proper mpeg rip at 320/kbs bit rate and 48K Hz sample rate, it´s not far from physicly impossible for a human to hear any difference from a, say FLAC.

Listening to lossless copies: pointless. Ripping from a lossless copy, obviously better than ripping from CD audio...

Back to topic: /thread soon?

Depends how good your hearing is. Also, CD audio (wav) is considered lossless digital. We can go back and fourth for days so let's leave it at that <3

OT: Not feelin' this tune as much as the Experience era original work.
  • Majin
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 397

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56671

When I bought my comp I got the top of the range Soundblaster card with the big external control until that has the X-fi setting to make MP3 sound CD quality. They sound great, but put a CD through it and it sounds truly amazing I have to say. I can hear a slight difference in the high end between MP3 and CD, but that is all.
  • WayneB
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 2902
A lovely thank you to Mr. W 30, James Jupiter the 8th, Mrs. 303, Mr. 909, and especially Monsieur Akai 1100 (The Earthbound Crew)

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56673

We started off taking the piss, not sure where we are now. Feeling afraid.
I'll just post this anyways...

Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.

I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange...well don't get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren't stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you'll be glad you did.
  • Martinstatic
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 1579

XLBaron wrote:
Shoot heroin in ur ass!

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56696

Martinstatic wrote:
We started off taking the piss, not sure where we are now. Feeling afraid.
I'll just post this anyways...

Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.

I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange...well don't get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren't stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you'll be glad you did.

Who in the hell told you that?

Anyways.....
  • Majin
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 397

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56723

I thought I had heard every Prodigy tune until I heard this remix Made in Two Minutes, Cheers for the link and of course I knew WayneB would have this in his collection. Good on ya Wayne!!!
  • jungle vibes
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 1100
Lyrical Tactic Vocal Gymnastics

Made in Two Minutes 2 years, 1 month ago #56752

Jungle Vibes wrote:
I thought I had heard every Prodigy tune until I heard this remix Made in Two Minutes, Cheers for the link and of course I knew WayneB would have this in his collection. Good on ya Wayne!!!



Ha-ha, cheers bro. Nice to see you on here again.
  • WayneB
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 2902
A lovely thank you to Mr. W 30, James Jupiter the 8th, Mrs. 303, Mr. 909, and especially Monsieur Akai 1100 (The Earthbound Crew)

Made in Two Minutes 2 years ago #57018

Martinstatic wrote:
for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.

ROFL !
  • Antoine59
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 46
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: fLiNtY, tomás, arie
Time to create page: 0.45 seconds