Deviant_Tech wrote:
Zumo, did you watch Liam record these into his Apple and help him write the email that sent these to Rockstar? No? Then you're not sure of shit. For all we know, Liam could have recorded these right from the W-30 onto tape and snail mailed that just like he would have in 91. Besides, we're talking about Liam here, a self admitted non-techie that may or may not know how to even convert stuff to mp3 and ended up actually emailing the Pro-Tools files. Either way, you're whining about CD-Quality files that were recorded off a 15 year old 12-bit sampler!
Liam has often said he didnt like how new tunes were spead live in low quality, so sure he must have an idea of what he is doing. Why would he then spread these tunes in shite quality? Besides, Experience sounded better than these files, so i dont think old hardware is the main problem.
Deviant_Tech wrote:
Plus, if you'd step back and look at the big picture, you'd realize band websites are primarily for promotion and are more focused on being flashy and unqiue, NOT centered around being a file repository. Ensuring all audio files available via the website are at 320kps, 24 bit stereo to please audiophites is not priority #1.
Would it have harmed the beefy webdesigners to release better recordings? No. It might even have saved them the trouble of having to put it all into flash first.
Deviant_Tech wrote:
It's no wonder Liam doesn't play any new stuff out yet. It's no wonder he's been slow to upload exclusive stuff. It's no wonder albums take 7 years to write. Because of whiney shits like you lot moaning at every little thing you think you can. Beggers can't be choosers.
This is pretty irrelevant.. And who was the little kiddy moaner in the girls remix thing?

huh? You are the most moaning user on this entire forum.
Deviant_Tech wrote:
/end rant against ungratful bitchy fans.
Im ranting at rockstar if you would be so kind and see who my first post was aimed at.